For immediate release                                                  

12 March 2024

ALLIANZ TECHNOLOGY TRUST PLC

LEI: 549300OMDPMJU23SSH75

FINAL RESULTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2023

The following comprises extracts from the Company's Annual Financial Report ('AFR') for the period ended 31 December 2023. The full AFR is available to be viewed on or downloaded from the Company's website at www.allianztechnologytrust.com. Copies will be posted to shareholders shortly.

For further information contact:

Tim Scholefield         Stephanie Carbonneil                 Kelly Nice

Chairman                  Head of Investment Trusts         Company Secretary

Telephone:

020 3246 7475          020 3246 7539                           020 3246 7475

MANAGEMENT REPORT

Highlights:

·      Strong absolute performance - Net Asset Value per share ('NAV') increased by 46.4%. The Company slightly underperformed its benchmark - by 1.8% - due to its underweight position in mega-cap stocks which led sector gains.  Share price increased by 44.5%.

·      Good portfolio liquidity, the Company has no gearing of its own and no private equity or unquoted holdings.

·      The Board has full confidence in the Investment Manager's differentiated strategy of focusing on mid- and large-cap stocks and in the technology sector as a source of longer-term superior returns.

·      Performance driven by exposure to AI, cyber-security and other secular growth areas in technology.

Chairman's Statement

Welcome

Welcome to this report on Allianz Technology Trust PLC for the financial year ending 31 December 2023. 2023 was certainly another tumultuous year in terms of the geopolitical and economic backdrop. I am pleased to report that the Company once again won the Investment Week Investment Company of the Year Award in the 'Specialist' category, having previously done so from 2017 to 2021 inclusive. The award is based around our performance over 3 years, as well as other qualitative factors.

Performance

Technology stocks performed strongly in 2023 buoyed by a combination of optimism over the sector's growth potential together with an increasing confidence that the peak in interest rates had finally been reached. Against this backdrop, it is a pleasure to also be able to report a strong absolute Net Asset Value ('NAV') Total Return of 46.4% for Allianz Technology Trust PLC and a share price return of 44.5%. The NAV return was slightly behind the 48.2% return of our benchmark, the Dow Jones World Technology Index (sterling adjusted, total return). This modest underperformance reflected our relatively smaller exposure to the very largest group of companies, the so-called 'mega-caps'. Our portfolio manager focuses on the mid- and large-cap segments reflecting our belief that companies at an earlier stage of their development provide better opportunities for long-term earnings growth.

No dividend is proposed in the year ended 31 December 2023 (2022: nil). Given the nature of the Company's investments and its stated objective to achieve long-term capital growth, the Board continues to consider it unlikely that any dividend will be declared in the near future.

Backdrop

The direction of global stock markets continued to be determined primarily by the course of inflation. Central banks have navigated a difficult path since inflation took off from historic lows, balancing the taming of rising prices with the desire to avoid recession and it wasn't until toward the end of the year that definitive signs that inflation had peaked became apparent. Those signs were received well though and markets demonstrated renewed optimism in anticipation of easing of interest rates.

There was little economic growth to speak about around the world. Indeed, China which finally emerged from Covid restrictions achieved a lacklustre recovery. Geopolitics continued to astound and confound humanity. In February Ukraine passed its first anniversary of the Russian invasion and subsequent war and in October the Middle East was thrust into the limelight when Hamas terrorists launched a sudden attack in Israel with shocking civilian loss of life. Israel responded and an intense conflict has since raged throughout Gaza with a further terrible loss of life. As I write, in the Red Sea Houthi rebels are attacking commercial shipping. The disruption from this latest episode will have an impact on costs of shipped goods and is therefore a potential threat to inflation remaining on course to meet central bank targets. US/China and China/Taiwan tensions also remained present and of concern in 2023.

Despite the backdrop noted above, technology continued to excite and inspire. An obvious connected theme to the geopolitical storm is cybersecurity. As nation states, terrorist organisations and criminals have stepped up digital attacks, cybersecurity has become more and more important to maintaining the smooth functioning of companies, infrastructure and society. Of course, artificial intelligence ('AI') was the story of the year, raising appetites for technology once more, sending many technology stocks higher, notably Nvidia, a so-called 'picks-and-shovels' company as it provides the chips necessary to power cutting-edge AI applications.

Our portfolio manager is occasionally questioned as to whether the portfolio may be too US centric. The US weighting is certainly high at around 87% as at the end of December. The reality is that the US listed companies continue to dominate tech, a reflection of the depth of US intellectual and financial capital, together with a supportive listed market structure, although it should be kept in mind that many of our portfolio companies generate revenues all around the globe and just happen to be listed in the US.

Whilst China has been a source of tech growth in past years the path has not been smooth. Our portfolio manager was an early investor in the China tech story, however he also exited relatively early and for some years now has preferred not to invest there, being primarily concerned about the possibility of state interference in the activity of listed companies.

Discount

The Company traded at an average discount of 12.1% over the period (low of 8.7% and high of 15.7%) despite the positive absolute performance noted. In my view this reflects the interest rate uncertainty apparent for much of the year together with sentiment towards investment trusts in general. That latter point is evidenced by the average discount for investment trusts reaching levels not seen since the global financial crisis in 2008.

Our policy in respect of buying back shares remains unchanged. Currently we would consider buying back shares during periods where the discount is consistently over 7% and it is felt appropriate to do so given the prevailing market backdrop. In the financial year we bought back an aggregate 16,530,708 shares at an average discount of 12.1% and total cost of £40.2m. Since the end of the financial year, up to 12 March 2024 we have repurchased a further 3,271,401 shares at an average discount of 11.9% and total cost of £10.6m. All shares repurchased have been held in treasury rather than cancelled as this makes them readily available to be reissued if sufficient demand occurs in the future.

At the forthcoming AGM, the Board proposes both a renewal of the usual 10% authority to issue new shares and also a renewal of the authority to issue an additional 10% in order to avoid the cost of a further General Meeting should the 10% authority be exhausted as has happened previously when demand was high. The Board will also once again seek authority to buy back up to 14.99% of the shares in issue. The Board recommends that shareholders vote in favour of these resolutions.

Any new shares will only be issued at a premium to NAV and if the Board is satisfied that the issuance is in the best interests of existing shareholders. Similarly, any buy back of shares will only take place where we believe it to be beneficial to shareholders.

AI (and the debates stemming from it)

As previously commented, excitement around AI dominated the tech sector in 2023. Whilst AI itself is not new, advances in generative AI in 2023 pushed it further into our consciousness than ever before. Whilst the main effect of this was to generate excitement - the same excitement that aided the performance of technology indices generally and a few companies specifically - it also raised some fear and trepidation.

AI is a rapidly moving frontier in many ways and will necessarily bring risk as well as opportunity as it develops and is implemented. On the one hand AI should have significant benefits to society, removing menial tasks from many roles and advancing the pace of new medical developments to name but two. On the flip side, there are concerns it might negatively affect humanity, for example via its impact on low-skill labour markets, particularly for certain sectors where AI, robotics and automation can readily replace human labour. It is also potentially subject to misuse and utilisation for negative and even criminal activity.

The Board is cognisant of such potential issues. We are keeping a watching brief and remain focused on the potential risk to the Company's portfolio and operations. For example, we dedicated part of our 2023 strategy meeting to a discussion around AI-related risks and opportunities. Amongst other aspects, we discussed types of risk, how governments and authorities might respond, the trajectory of AI algorithm development and how we should best identify risks and opportunities as a Company going forward.

ESG

As you will be aware, the portfolio manager considers ESG as part of the stock analysis and investment management process. The Board remains cognisant of investors' concerns and desire to understand better the broader impact of the investment choices that they make. The Board engages closely with Voya as the Investment Manager and AllianzGI UK as the AIFM on ESG policies and processes and further information can be found on pages 20 to 23 of the Annual Report.

Portfolio management

I am pleased to report that Erik Swords has been appointed as Portfolio Manager alongside Mike Seidenberg, who will remain Lead Portfolio Manager, with effect from 1 March 2024. Erik is a managing director and Head of Global Technology at Voya and has 23 years of investment industry expertise. He already works closely with Mike in the San Francisco office.

The costs of running your Company

Your Board has maintained its close attention to the costs of running the Company. The Company's Ongoing Charges Figure ('OCF'), which is calculated by dividing ongoing operating expenses by the average NAV, has remained the same as 2022 at 0.70%.

The OCF excludes any performance fee due to the Investment Manager. No performance fee has been earned in 2023. It should be noted that the underperformance recorded over the past three years will have to be made back, and the NAV will need to exceed the figure as at the end of 2020 (which set a new high watermark) before any future performance fee can be accrued.

Board matters

Although I reported to shareholders as Chairman in the 2023 interim report, this is my first Annual Financial Report in this role. I would therefore like to reiterate my thanks to my predecessor, Robert Jeens, for his leadership of the Company over his tenure and for his help and support as I took on the role of Chairman. I hope that this next period in the Company's history can prove as positive in respect of growth as the past one.

At the conclusion of the 2024 AGM, Humphrey Van der Klugt will step down from the Board, having served since 2015. We thank Humphrey for his significant contribution to the Company's development over the past nine years and his part in its significant growth over that time.

Elisabeth Scott has served on the Board for nine years as at 1 February 2024 and to allow for orderly succession planning she will retire at the AGM in 2025.

As previously announced, with effect from 29 November 2023 Neeta Patel was appointed as Chairman of the Management Engagement Committee replacing me. Neeta will also become Senior Independent Director when Humphrey steps down. Katya Thomson will be appointed as Chairman of the Remuneration Committee at the conclusion of the 2024 AGM.

Although just outside of the reporting period, as previously announced, Simon (Sam) Davis was appointed a non-executive Director on 1 January 2024 and has also joined the Audit and Risk, Management Engagement, Remuneration and Nomination Committees. Sam is a non-executive director of The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust PLC. Sam brings a wealth of investment experience across global markets, and we are therefore delighted that he is joining the Board and we look forward to working with him.

Annual General Meeting ('AGM') arrangements

This year's AGM will be held on 24 April 2024 at 2.30pm. The full Notice of Meeting can be found on page 75 of the Annual Report. Full details of the special business to be considered at the AGM can be found on pages 31 to 33 of the Annual Report.

As with 2023, the AGM will be a hybrid meeting, meaning shareholders can either attend physically or online. We will not be providing online voting for the 2024 meeting. This is due to the relatively high cost to enable the service not having been matched by shareholder take up of the service over the past two years. Should there be reasonable demand emerging from shareholders in the future for online voting then we will look at a possible reintroduction. For this reason, we strongly encourage all shareholders to submit their votes using the proxy voting process by the deadline of 22 April 2024 as detailed in the Notice of Meeting on page 75 of the Annual Report. Those shareholders attending virtually will be able to view the AGM and submit questions electronically.

The Board encourages shareholders to attend the AGM if possible. A presentation by the portfolio manager will be made at the start of the meeting. For those unable to attend either physically or virtually, a recording of the AGM will be posted to the Company's website as soon as practicable after the event.

The Board looks forward to welcoming shareholders to this year's event.

Outlook

It is relatively difficult to make predictions for the year ahead in such an uncertain world. However, most indicators are suggesting a pivot in interest rates could well be on the cards which would certainly be positive for growth stocks, including many technology stocks. Even if this does not provide a tailwind, it should at least remove a headwind as the discount rate used to value future cashflows of companies reduces. With valuations of many technology companies having come back to more reasonable levels since the end of 2020, this could allow some further recovery in the sector.

Geopolitics remain a source of uncertainty. Whilst the fortunes of individual companies are often insulated from the direct impacts of world events, heightened uncertainty will impact on sentiment in general and affect factors such as consumer confidence. Certain companies could find themselves more directly affected by geopolitics depending on their location, but this is something our portfolio manager monitors closely as part of the portfolio management process. It will certainly be an interesting year in terms of the political arena, with elections in the US and almost certainly the UK.

We are not out of the woods in terms of fears around falling into recession, however the hope is that central banks have done their job well enough and we will instead see a 'soft-landing' - that is, a decline in inflation without a significant set back in economic growth.

What is in no doubt is that technology will continue to dominate our lives and re-shape the future. Such a 'new frontier' remains an extremely exciting place to invest, though of course also brings risks for investors. On your behalf, the Board in conjunction with the Investment Manager will remain focussed on providing a portfolio that we believe will capture the exciting growth available from investing in technology.

Tim Scholefield

Chairman

12 March 2024

Portfolio Manager's Report

2023 started on a cautious note. Although inflation had started to fall, it was not yet beaten. The impact of rising interest rates was beginning to be felt in the real economy, and there were concerns about how high rates may need to rise. A winter energy crisis had been averted, but a 'hard landing' still appeared a plausible scenario for the world economy.

There were glimmers of hope. Some of the supply chain bottlenecks that had contributed to inflationary pressures were starting to unwind. Freight prices had started to drop and the pandemic-related backlogs started to ease. There was also the prospect of a stronger performance from China as the country relaxed its strict quarantine restrictions.

However, the fragility of the economic environment was exposed by the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank in March. Its weakness was attributed to losses on its bond portfolio. It had significant exposure to startups and venture-backed firms, but the US regulator stepped in swiftly to protect deposit holders. The crisis threatened to destabilise the world's banking system, with Europe's Credit Suisse also proving vulnerable. A forced merger with UBS appeared to put an end to the crisis, but it left investors wary of other bear-traps in the financial system.

In the meantime, attention continued to be minutely focused on inflation and when the Federal Reserve's rate rising cycle might draw to a close. Rate rises continued in the first half of the year, albeit at a slower pace. The problem for policymakers was that while headline rates of inflation decelerated sharply over the year, core inflation proved stickier.

Ultimately, however, the US Federal Reserve paused its tightening cycle in July, even though it continued to talk tough on inflation. US Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell insisted they would stay the course until the inflation battle had been won. At his Jackson Hole speech in August, he said: "We are prepared to raise rates further if appropriate, and intend to hold policy at a restrictive level until we are confident that inflation is moving sustainably down toward our objective."

Towards the end of the year, speculation mounted that US interest rates may soon be lowered as inflation continued to drop, and by December, the US Federal Reserve had pivoted to forecasting 0.75% points of interest rate cuts in 2024. Fears of a US recession appeared to be overblown and hopes grew of a Goldilocks outcome for the US economy (with growth neither too hot nor too cold). US GDP growth continued to be strong, rising 5.2% in the third quarter fuelled by a strong consumer.

Elsewhere, growth was mixed. Economic activity in Europe remained anaemic at best. However, the European Central Bank and Bank of England continued to insist that the battle against inflation was far from over. Their hawkishness versus the US Federal Reserve saw the euro and British pound strengthen against the US dollar. The Japanese yen weakened against all three currencies, in spite of a revival of economic growth and inflation in Japan as the country's central bank continued its loose monetary policy. China's economic rebound from pandemic restrictions disappointed, with the health of its property sector a major concern.

Fears of inflation briefly revived in the summer, after oil prices rallied in response to oil-producing countries agreeing to cut output. Nevertheless, Brent crude closed the year slightly lower at just under US$80 a barrel. Overall oil prices fell around 10% over 2023, marking the first annual decline since 2020. 2023 ended with inflation pressures easing, with interest rate cuts on the horizon and with economic growth holding up. It proved a far better outcome than many had anticipated at the start of the year.

Stock markets

Global stock markets made progress in 2023, with the MSCI World Index up 17.2% over the period. However, it was a rocky ride and for much of the year, market leadership was held by a narrow range of artificial intelligence-related companies. These 'Magnificent Seven' - Amazon, Alphabet, Apple, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, NVIDIA and Tesla - benefited from growing excitement in the potential for AI and its applications, following the launch of generative AI programme Chat GPT.

These stocks drove global indices higher, but many areas did not participate in the rally. While companies in the information technology, communication services, consumer discretionary and industrials sectors turned in a creditable performance, defensive stocks in the consumer staples, utilities and health care sectors barely rose, while energy stocks were held back by weakening oil and gas prices. With economic growth uncertain, investors retreated to those companies with reliable earnings, even if they had to pay a little more for them.

Stock market performance was still highly dependent on interest rate expectations. There were two notable setbacks over the year: the first was prompted by March's banking crisis, but this was swiftly resolved after regulatory intervention; the second came in October after higher oil prices prompted a brief spike in inflation, driving fears that rates would need to stay higher for longer.

This narrow market leadership widened out in the final months of the year, as investors started to anticipate rate cuts in the year ahead. November and December saw a significant, broad-based rally. November was the strongest month for markets in three years and supportive statements from the US Federal Reserve ensured the rally continued to the end of the year. Overall, the MSCI World Index recorded its strongest year since 2019.

Key themes

Interest rates and inflation

Just as they did in 2022, 2023 was a year when investors watched the US Federal Reserve. Once again, the fortunes of individual companies appeared to matter less than the latest comments from central banks as investors tried to judge whether central banks would be able to tame inflation without collapsing the economy.

Ultimately, however, markets are now reassured that the US Federal Reserve has managed to engineer a 'soft landing'. The much-anticipated US recession remains a possibility in the year ahead, but most market participants now believe it is likely to be short-lived and shallow if it materialises at all. Rates cuts could come as early as March in the US and would be welcomed by markets.

Geopolitics

The fragile geopolitical landscape continued in 2023. The war in Ukraine was ongoing, with little progress on either side. World powers continued to pick sides, which saw some redrawing of trading relationships. Those countries that could remain neutral, such as Vietnam or parts of Latin America, saw their economies benefit.

There was new fragility in the Middle East after the unprecedented terrorist attacks by Hamas on Israel on 7 October, and Israel's subsequent military response which has seen ongoing conflict in Gaza with huge loss of life.

There was some easing of US/China relations, with Presidents Xi and Biden meeting in November. Nevertheless, a return to the unfettered trading relationship of recent history appeared improbable.

Artificial Intelligence

The launch of Chat GPT and its rapid adoption showed the potential for artificial intelligence - and some of its risks. It holds the potential to drive productivity gains for companies at a time when productivity has stagnated in many Western economies. In a report in April, Goldman Sachs said generative AI could raise global GDP by 7% - equivalent to almost $7 trillion.

Forward-thinking corporations are already looking at how AI could improve their business and 2024 may be when these plans start to come to fruition. Companies are investing significant amounts in AI. Microsoft, Google and Amazon have done a number of blockbuster deals with AI start-ups in 2023. This accounted for two-thirds of the US$27bn raised by fledgling AI companies in 2023, according to data from private market researchers PitchBook.

Performance

The Company's net assets rose 46.4% for the year to 31 December 2023. This was marginally behind its benchmark, the Dow Jones World Technology Index (sterling adjusted, total return), which rose 48.2%. The strength of the 'Magnificent Seven' and their dominance in the index made it difficult to beat. We continued to hold below index weights in these stocks to avoid concentration risk in the portfolio.

The broad-based rally at the end of the year was more favourable for the Company, with market attention returning to some of our higher growth, mid cap companies. This has tended to be a more fertile spot to find opportunities, where a focus on bottom-up fundamentals and industry expertise can provide an edge versus the market. The third quarter earnings season had confirmed the strength of earnings momentum in a number of our holdings, particularly those focused on cloud computing. We took bolder positions in these areas, which helped us participate in the rally in full.

Weakness tended to come in idiosyncratic areas, rather than from any major themes. For example, Pay.com was a notable detractor, hit by concerns over the outlook for the jobs market and some operational issues that saw it miss on earnings. Okta was also weak, impacted by execution challenges.

It was a mixed year for the semiconductor sector. It was important to differentiate between 'leading and lagging' semiconductor groups. While Nvidia soared on the back of demand for its AI-focused chips, it was a tougher year for generic semiconductors and those exposed to auto-related sectors. The Company moved away from auto-related semiconductors in the first half of the year, and benefited from not holding generic semiconductor groups such as Texas Instruments. Nvidia was a major holding from February onwards.

Geopolitical tensions continued to support demand for cybersecurity companies during the year, particularly at the end of 2023 when software and IT services outperformed other areas. Artificial intelligence also drove demand, with more data requiring greater protection. Cyber attacks continued with a major Chinese espionage campaign infiltrating the US government. A new SEC ruling requiring disclosure of events within four days also impacted demand for cybersecurity solutions. Overall spending on cybersecurity continues to grow faster than other major technology segments.

The Company also benefited from the areas it didn't hold. For example, for most of the year it did not hold anything in China. The weakness of Chinese markets was a dominant feature of the year and this helped performance.

Stock highlights

The performance of the Magnificent Seven was the key highlight for equity markets overall. Five of the Magnificent Seven (Apple, Alphabet, Meta Platforms, Microsoft and Nvidia) are held in both the Company and in the benchmark, generally at a lower concentration than the Company's benchmark index. The exception was Meta, where the Company held a near-double benchmark weight (at 6.3%). This provided the strongest contribution to returns over the year. Having previously exited our historic position, we bought back the stock at the end of 2022 on the back of expectations that its cost-cutting initiatives, lower valuation level and secular growth would drive shares higher. Over the year, an improving competitive position and new product development helped push it higher. The Company also held Amazon.com and Tesla, the two remaining Magnificent Seven stocks, which are not part of the benchmark and were additive to performance.

MongoDB was another notable performer over the year. The database software company posted consecutive quarters of strong earnings, ahead of market expectations. Earnings were fuelled by a faster recovery in consumption trends for the business, driven by the growth of generative AI.

China was a particular weak spot over the year, as international investors withdrew from the market. We have been wary of the Chinese market for some time, believing government interference threatens shareholder returns. Not holding Tencent Holdings and to a lesser extent Alibaba contributed to overall performance versus the benchmark during the year.

The one Chinese stock we owned was JD.com, holding it briefly between January and February. It is an online direct sales company offering a wide range of products through its website and mobile applications. We thought it may be a beneficiary of China's reopening trade. As it was, the Chinese consumer failed to revive and we sold it quickly. Although it detracted from overall performance, it proved a prudent sale, with the share price tumbling after we exited.

Identity management group Okta was a weak spot. It had a number of operational problems: it had over-hired, leaving sales territories cut too small for sales reps to meet their numbers. The company also struggled from increased competition, while a large number of cyber attacks weighed on its credibility. Paycom Software was also a performance detractor, having suffered a series of disappointing earnings reports. As a designer and developer of software solutions to manage the employment life cycle, it was hit by concerns about the jobs outlook and a moderation in economic growth.

The Company's cash weighting was lower than last year - at around 2% on average. This detracted from returns given the strength of markets, particularly at the start of the year. Nevertheless, it allowed us to retain optionality in the portfolio during periods of uncertainty.

Looking forward

At the start of 2023, valuations were compelling. After a significant market improvement - along with higher earnings - technology companies appear to be trading at around fair value today. That said, there are some tailwinds for the year ahead and we believe the equity market recovery over the past few months can extend into 2024.

At the December 2023 Federal Open Market Committee meeting, the US Federal Reserve signalled multiple rate cuts could come in 2024. Inflation continues to weaken and, while the jobs market remains buoyant, growth is moderating. With interest rate cuts on the horizon and an economic soft landing expected, investors are likely to be confident enough to look beyond the mega-caps into other parts of the market. Broader earnings growth may accelerate this trend.

There are going to be bumps along the way and the market might be due for a short-term pause after its recent strength, but there are reasons to be optimistic about the long-term secular growth prospects for technology. These include artificial intelligence and machine learning, the Internet of Things, cyber security, digital assets and mobility. The macroeconomic challenges of the past few years are likely to ease, which should give investors greater confidence.

The challenges of the past few years have forced companies to look at their cost structures, re-engineer their businesses and cut unprofitable lines. The result is that the survivors are far stronger, with better competitive positions and stronger earnings. We continue to believe the technology sector can provide some of the best absolute and relative return opportunities in the equity markets.

Mike Seidenberg

Lead Portfolio Manager

Voya Investment Management Co LLC

12 March 2024

Viability Statement

In accordance with the Corporate Governance provisions the Company is required to make a forward looking (longer term) Viability Statement. In order to do this the Board has considered the appetite for a technology investment trust against the current market backdrop, and has formally assessed the prospects for the Company over a period of five years. The Board believes that the period of five years is appropriate and is in line with the five year continuation vote. The next continuation vote will be put to shareholders at the AGM in 2026. In order to assess the prospects for the Company the Board has considered:

-      The investment objective and strategy taking into account recent, past and potential performance against both the benchmark, other indices of note and peers;

-      The financial position of the Company, which does not currently utilise gearing in any form but does maintain a portfolio of, in the main, non-income bearing investments;

-      The liquidity of the portfolio and the ability to liquidate the portfolio on the failure of a continuation vote;

-      The macro economic conditions and geopolitical events;

-      The ever increasing level of technology adopted by both individuals and corporations alike;

-      The inherent risks in such technology both in terms of speed of advancement; and

-      The principal risks faced by the Company as outlined below.

The Board is fully aware that the world of technology is constantly evolving and growing and could potentially look very different in five years. However, based on the results of the formal assessment, through regular updates from the AIFM and the Investment Manager, the Board believes it is reasonable to expect that the Company will continue in operation and meet its liabilities for the period of five years under this review.

Investment Controls and Monitoring

The Board in conjunction with the AIFM and the Investment Manager has put in place a schedule of investment controls and restrictions within which investment decisions are made. These controls include limits on the size and type of investment and are monitored on a constant basis. They are formally signed off by the AIFM and the Investment Manager every month and are reviewed by the Board at every meeting.

Principal & Emerging Risks and Uncertainties

The principal risks identified by the Board are set out in the table below, together with information about the actions taken to mitigate these risks. A more detailed version of this table in the form of a Risk Map and Controls document is reviewed in full and updated by the Audit & Risk Committee and Board at least twice per year. Individual risks, including emerging risks and threats to reputation, are considered by the Board in further detail depending on the market situation and a high-level review of all known risks faced by the Company is considered at every Board meeting. The principal risks and uncertainties faced by the Company relate to the nature of its objectives and strategy as an investment company and the operations of its third party service providers.

In addition to the specific principal risks identified in the table above, general risks are also present relating to compliance with accounting, legal and regulatory requirements, and with corporate governance and shareholder relations issues which could have an impact on reputation and market rating. Management of the services provided and the internal controls procedures of the third party providers is monitored and reported on by the AIFM to the Board. These risks are all formally reviewed by the Board twice each year and at such other times as deemed necessary. Details of the Company's compliance with corporate governance best practice, including information on relations with shareholders, are set out in the Corporate Governance Statement within the Directors' Report beginning on page 34 of the Annual Report.

The Board's review of the risks faced by the Company also includes an assessment of the residual risks after mitigating action has been taken.

On behalf of the Board

Tim Scholefield

Chairman

12 March 2024

Related Party Transactions

During the financial year no transactions with related parties took place which would materially affect the financial position or the performance of the Company.

Statement of Directors' Responsibilities

The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Financial Report and the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and regulations. Company law requires the Directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year. Under that law the Directors have elected to prepare the financial statements in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (United Kingdom Accounting Standards and applicable law). The financial statements are required by law to give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Company and of the total return of the Company for that year. In preparing these financial statements, the Directors are required to:

-      select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;

-      make judgements and estimates that are reasonable and prudent;

-      state whether applicable UK accounting standards have been followed; and

-      prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis, unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Company will continue in business.

The Directors confirm that the financial statements comply with the above requirements.

The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Company and enable them to ensure that the financial statements comply with the Companies Act 2006. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.

Under applicable law and regulations, the Directors are also responsible for preparing a Strategic Report, a Directors' Report, and Corporate Governance Statement, and a Directors' Remuneration Report which comply with that law and those regulations.

The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the corporate and financial information included on the Company's website. The financial statements are published on www.allianztechnologytrust.com, which is a website maintained by the Alternative Investment Fund Manager. The work undertaken by the Auditors does not involve consideration of the maintenance and integrity of the website and, accordingly, the Auditors accept no responsibility for any changes that may have occurred to the financial statements since they were initially presented on the website. Visitors to the website need to be aware that legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of the financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.

Neither an audit nor a review provides assurance on the maintenance and integrity of the website, including controls used to achieve this, and in particular whether any changes may have occurred to the financial information since first published. These matters are the responsibility of the Directors but no control procedures can provide absolute assurance in this area.

The Directors each confirm to the best of their knowledge that:

 (a)       the Financial Statements, prepared in accordance with applicable accounting standards, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and return of the Company; and

(b)        the Strategic Report includes a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the position of the Company, along with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties that the Company faces.

The Directors confirm that the Annual Report and Financial Statements, taken as a whole are fair, balanced and understandable and provide the information necessary to assess the Company's position and performance, business model and strategy.

For and on behalf of the Board

Tim Scholefield

Chairman

12 March 2024